Marko Kreen wrote:
> There is this tiny matter of replicating schema changes asynchronously,
> but I suspect nobody actually cares. Few random points about that:
I'm not sure I follow you - the Sybase 'warm standby' replication of
everything is really
useful for business continuity. The per-table rep is more effective for
data, but is painful to maintain.
Not having something that automagically reps a complete copy including
for temp tables) is a major weakness IMO.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: James Mansion||Date: 2008-06-01 19:57:00|
|Subject: Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL|
|Previous:||From: Zdenek Kotala||Date: 2008-06-01 19:03:26|
|Subject: Re: Where can I find the doxyfile?|