Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: DTrace probe patch for OS X Leopard

From: Robert Lor <Robert(dot)Lor(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: DTrace probe patch for OS X Leopard
Date: 2008-02-29 20:27:54
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> We still have what I consider a big problem with the names of the
> macros.  Perhaps that could be fixed by passing the auto-generated
> file through a sed script to put a prefix on the macro names before
> we start to use it?

Post processing the auto generated header may work, but I think it could 
be unnecessarily complicated and error proned. First, the formats of the 
header between Mac OS X and Solaris are different, and I'm pretty sure 
it'll be different for FreeBSD when it comes out with Dtrace support. 
Second, if there are changes in the  content of the header in the 
future, the sed script may break. I can investigate this approach 
further, but I personally prefer a solution this is less error proned.

And don't think adding a simple comment before the macro call is 
sufficient? This can be documented so everyone knows the convention.


In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Robert LorDate: 2008-02-29 20:38:54
Subject: Re: DTrace probe patch for OS X Leopard
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2008-02-29 19:39:55
Subject: sinval.c / sinvaladt.c restructuring

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group