Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea

From: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org, Mija Lee <mija(at)scharp(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea
Date: 2007-09-29 14:23:59
Message-ID: 46FE5FFF.6070606@sun.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers pgsql-novice

Tom Lane wrote:

>
> If this is what's happening I'd claim it is a kernel bug, but seeing
> that I see it on FC6 and Miya sees it on Solaris 10, it would be a bug
> widespread enough that we'd not be likely to get it killed off soon.
>

I think my colleague was solving similar issue in JavaDB. IIRC the
problem is in how NFS works and conclusion was do not use JavaDB (Derby)
on NFS. I forwarded this issue to our NFS gurus and I will send updated
information.

Zdenek

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2007-10-01 17:13:41 Re: [HACKERS] PG on NFS may be just a bad idea
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-09-29 03:58:22 PG on NFS may be just a bad idea

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-09-29 14:41:55 Re: PGBuildfarm member skylark Branch HEAD Failed at Stage Make
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2007-09-29 13:58:09 Something's been bugging me

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nis Jørgensen 2007-10-01 10:19:05 Re: Why is my view ddl being altered by postgres?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-09-29 03:58:22 PG on NFS may be just a bad idea