Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: stored procedure stats in collector

From: Martin Pihlak <martin(dot)pihlak(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: depesz(at)depesz(dot)com
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: stored procedure stats in collector
Date: 2007-09-26 13:08:54
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 05:34:32PM -0700, Neil Conway wrote:
>> That seems a confusing set of values. Perhaps "off", "pl", and "all"
>> would be clearer?
>> I'm curious if you've measured the performance overhead of enabling this
>> functionality.
> i'm quite worried about "all" setting.
> all operators are functions as well, so tracking literally all function
> calls might be too heavy.
"all" would additionally count only C and SQL functions, builtins (language
"internal") are skipped. Maybe there should be option to count these as well,
perhaps with a really scare name (track_functions = all_plus_internal).

> on the other hand i would like to be able to track some non-pl functions
> like RI%.
These are builtin.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Michael MeskesDate: 2007-09-26 13:20:13
Subject: Re: MSVC build scripts status
Previous:From: Martin BednářDate: 2007-09-26 12:54:28
Subject: (bez předmětu)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group