From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: MSVC build scripts status |
Date: | 2007-09-25 09:38:22 |
Message-ID: | 46F8D70E.2040808@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 11:51:47PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>>> However, neither the new nor the old scripts run ECPG tests on my setup,
>>> so I have been unable to test that.
>> I'm confused. We have MSVC buildfarm animals that show green, so aren't
>> they getting through ECPG tests?
>
> Yeah, I'm confused too. I thought they did, but looking at my own animal
> (Skylark) it seems not to be running any ecpg checks?
$CONFUSION++
> Oh, and I'm now seeing failures on my dev box with ECPG on the MSVC build
> using "the old way" (.bat-files):
> array_of_struct.c
> array_of_struct.pgc(26): error C2065: 'customer' : undeclared identifier
> array_of_struct.pgc(26): error C2146: syntax error : missing ';' before identifier 'custs1'
> array_of_struct.pgc(26): error C2065: 'custs1' : undeclared identifier
> array_of_struct.pgc(26): error C2109: subscript requires array or pointer type
> array_of_struct.pgc(27): error C2065: 'cust_ind' : undeclared identifier
> array_of_struct.pgc(27): error C2146: syntax error : missing ';' before identifier 'inds'
> array_of_struct.pgc(27): error C2065: 'inds' : undeclared identifier
> array_of_struct.pgc(27): error C2109: subscript requires array or pointer type
> array_of_struct.pgc(33): error C2275: 'customer2' : illegal use of this type as an expression
> array_of_struct.pgc(32) : see declaration of 'customer2'
>
>
> (it goes on like that for quite a bit, total of 70 errors in this file)
Yup, seeing that here from a manual run.
> If this has never run on the buildfarm, my guess is that it's been broken
> for about 5 weeks - when the "major rewrite" got in.
>
> Can someone confirm if this has ever executed on the buildfarm? Or if they
> the same errors with HEAD that I do? I haven't been running ecpgcheck
> manually for quite a while, since I thought it was on the bf run.
Same 70 errors here. Looking at my MSVC BF animals, I see no evidence
that they ever ran ECPGCheck :-(
/D
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-09-25 10:00:46 | Re: MSVC build scripts status |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-09-25 09:38:00 | Re: Suggestion for MSVC build |