From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: ACID (was Re: Reliable and fast ...) |
Date: | 2007-08-29 16:20:32 |
Message-ID: | 46D59CD0.8010404@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 08/29/07 10:40, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> Argh!!! The RDBMS that I typically use defaults to SERIALIZABLE.
>> SERIALIZABLE is really slow :). You should look into SERIALIZABLE only
>> for those transactions that need it. There is also SELECT FOR UPDATE.
>
> We use SERIALIZABLE (with all it's locking "issues") to guarantee
> the I in ACID. ISTM that READ COMMITTED can only deliver "ACD".
You are using serializable for select statements?
- ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFG1ZzQATb/zqfZUUQRAm+lAJ4i8s6I2MKCQGo1zD3g2w5lPRFikwCeNZML
4bV06CiM196qwC2l5MKqn10=
=ygzn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron Johnson | 2007-08-29 16:22:14 | Re: ACID (was Re: Reliable and fast ...) |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2007-08-29 16:15:37 | Re: Is there a better way to do this? |