Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Compilation errors

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Compilation errors
Date: 2007-02-28 22:13:59
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> I guess we could conditionally add prototypes for those functions to 
> all the .l files if you really want to move to 2.5.33. Kinda yucky, 
> though.

Actually, we couldn't.The definition section from the .l file gets 
included after these functions. So we'd need to include something in 
gram.y before including scan.c.



In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2007-02-28 22:14:24
Subject: Re: Resumable vacuum proposal and design overview
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2007-02-28 22:02:17
Subject: Re: Compilation errors

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group