Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: plperl/plperlu interaction

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plperl/plperlu interaction
Date: 2006-10-26 18:57:09
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> Anyway, it is probably not expected by many users that loading a module 
>> in plperlu makes it available to plperl  - I was slightly surprised 
>> myself to see it work and I am probably more aware than most of perl and 
>> plperl subtleties.
> I think that is a bug and needs to be fixed.  We have the precedent of
> pltcl, which uses separate interpreters for pltcl and pltclu for exactly
> this reason.

Fair enough.

I am not sure what our release timetable is - and presumably this should 
also be backpatched if we regard it as a bug. I won't be able to do much 
on this front for the next 2 weeks at least.



In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert TreatDate: 2006-10-26 19:06:13
Subject: Re: Replication documentation addition
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-10-26 18:32:07
Subject: Re: GUC description cleanup

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group