Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (

From: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, "eng(at)intranet(dot)greenplum(dot)com" <eng(at)intranet(dot)greenplum(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Date: 2005-11-24 05:34:03
Message-ID: 438550CB.5020506@paradise.net.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Luke Lonergan wrote:
> Mark,
>
> This is an excellent idea – unfortunately I’m in Maui right now
> (Mahalo!) and I’m not getting to testing with this. My first try was
> with 8.0.3 and it’s an 8.1 function I presume.
>
> Not to be lazy – but any hint as to how to do the same thing for 8.0?
>

Yeah, it's 8.1 - I didn't think to check against 8.0. The attached
variant works with 8.0.4 (textToQualifiedNameList needs 2 args)

cheers

Mark

P.s. Maui eh, sounds real nice.

Attachment Content-Type Size
fastcount-8.0.c text/plain 1.0 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Luke Lonergan 2005-11-24 08:17:06 Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Previous Message andrew 2005-11-24 05:20:19 Re: 8.1 count(*) distinct: IndexScan/SeqScan