Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Numeric 508 datatype

From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Date: 2005-11-17 09:57:01
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Simon Riggs wrote:
> Now we're into 8.2devel mode, its time to submit the previously
> discussed patch that:
> - reduces Numeric storage format by 2 bytes

This makes the often discussed binary upgrade impossible, so I wonder if 
two bytes savings are worth the trouble.


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Csaba NagyDate: 2005-11-17 09:59:39
Subject: Re: MERGE vs REPLACE
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2005-11-17 09:29:38
Subject: Re: ERROR: could not read block

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Martijn van OosterhoutDate: 2005-11-17 13:49:00
Subject: [PATCH] Formatting patch for psql
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2005-11-17 02:51:43
Subject: Re: drop if exists

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Markus WollnyDate: 2005-11-17 12:12:22
Subject: Re: Incomplete Startup Packet
Previous:From: Csaba NagyDate: 2005-11-17 09:41:59
Subject: Re: locked backend

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group