Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Performance Tuning Article

From: Keith Worthington <KeithW(at)NarrowPathInc(dot)com>
To: Frank Wiles <frank(at)wiles(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance Tuning Article
Date: 2005-06-23 02:31:29
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance

>>>  I've put together a short article and posted it online regarding
>>>  performance tuning PostgreSQL in general.  I believe it helps to
>>>  bring together the info in a easy to digest manner. I would
>>>  appreciate any feedback, comments, and especially any technical
>>>  corrections.
>>Looks nice. You should mark the link to the perf tips at
>>as  "PostgreSQL 7.4" and augment it with the current version here:
>>as well as the Annotated .Conf File:
>   Thanks! These changes have been incorporated. 
>>For my part, I've generally seen that SATA disks still suck for
>>read-write  applications.   I generally rate 1 UltraSCSI = 2 SATA
>>disks for anything but  a 99% read application.
>   I'll work this bit of wisdom in later tonight. Thanks again for the
>   feedback. 
>  ---------------------------------
>    Frank Wiles <frank(at)wiles(dot)org>
>  ---------------------------------


A couple of things I wish I had been told when I started asking how to 
configure a new machine.

Use RAID 10 (striping across mirrored disks)
  or RAID 0+1 (mirror a striped array) for your data.
Use RAID 1 (mirror) for your OS
Use RAID 1 (mirror) for the WAL.

Don't put anything else on the array holding the WAL.

There have been problems with Xeon processors.

Kind Regards,

In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Elliott BennettDate: 2005-06-23 03:19:53
Subject: select distinct on varchar -- wild performance differences!
Previous:From: Tobias BroxDate: 2005-06-23 01:06:04
Subject: Re: Performance Tuning Article

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group