Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Joel's Performance Issues WAS : Opteron vs Xeon

From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Joel's Performance Issues WAS : Opteron vs Xeon
Date: 2005-04-22 09:47:31
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
Dave Page wrote:
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org 
>>[mailto:pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of 
>>Andreas Pflug
>>Sent: 21 April 2005 14:06
>>To: Joel Fradkin
>>Cc: 'John A Meinel'; josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com; 
>>Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Joel's Performance Issues WAS : Opteron vs Xeon
>> From the data, I can see that you're probably using pgAdmin3.
>>The time to execute your query including transfer of all data to the 
>>client is 17s in this example, while displaying it (i.e. pure GUI and 
>>memory alloc stuff) takes 72s. Execute to a file to avoid this.
> Perhaps we should add a guruhint there for longer runtimes?

Yup, easily done as replacement for the "max rows exceeded" message box.
Added to TODO.txt.


In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Dawid KuroczkoDate: 2005-04-22 10:08:50
Subject: Re: immutable functions vs. join for lookups ?
Previous:From: Richard van den BergDate: 2005-04-22 09:04:17
Subject: Re: When are index scans used over seq scans?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group