Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout

From: "Bruno Almeida do Lago" <teolupus(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout
Date: 2005-02-24 13:28:34
Message-ID: 421dd635.7b3d0b0f.1e05.1618@smtp.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

No problems my friend :P

I thought that since the beginning and just sent the e-mail to confirm if
there was no software limitation.

Best Wishes,
Bruno Almeida do Lago

-----Original Message-----
From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 6:02 PM
To: Bruno Almeida do Lago
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout

Bruno,

> For example, 150 active connections on a medium-end
> 32-bit Linux server will consume significant system resources, and 600 is
> about the limit."

That, is, "is about the limit for a medium-end 32-bit Linux server".
Sorry
if the implication didn't translate well. If you use beefier hardware, of
course, you can manage more connections; personally I've never needed more
than 1000, even on a web site that gets 100,000 d.u.v.

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Allgood 2005-02-24 18:31:38 Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout
Previous Message Markus Schaber 2005-02-24 12:13:09 Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ?