Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions..

From: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions..
Date: 2005-01-06 15:52:25
Message-ID: 41DD5EB9.3030207@zeut.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32

Tom Lane wrote:

>Whether we're overestimating it or not, we have to make a decision and
>we have to make it now. This thread is singlehandedly delaying the 8.0
>release. Since I haven't seen any serious alternative proposed, I think
>we have to go with the CSIDL_APPDATA reference point.
>
>Given that decision it seems like the best names are
>
> APPDATA/postgresql/pgpass.txt
> APPDATA/postgresql/psqlrc.txt
> APPDATA/postgresql/psql_history
> APPDATA/postgresql/postgresql.crt
> APPDATA/postgresql/postgresql.key
> APPDATA/postgresql/root.crt
>
>Objections?
>

None. Looks good to me.

BTW, I agree with Magnus's argument that we are overestimating the cost
of it being hidden.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-01-06 16:19:14 Re: File names for client interfaces
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-01-06 15:48:16 Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions..