Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Date: 2004-02-26 20:41:26
Message-ID: 403E59F6.7000600@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-www

Josh Berkus wrote:

>Peter,
>
>
>
>>So yes, I
>>think this is a reasonable plan, just don't expect "collaboration" to
>>suddenly appear out of nowhere.
>>
>>
>
>Yeah. As my grandfather used to say, "You can lead a horse to water, but you
>can't make him shrink." (granddad is under care, now).
>
>Everyone: Further data: if we prefer BugZilla to GForge's lighter-weight bug
>tracking, it turns out that there is a BZ plug-in for GForge.
>
>

Perhaps when BZ supports PG - some progress is being made on that front,
but it's not a done deal yet.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Costa 2004-02-26 21:03:36 Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-02-26 20:32:05 Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Costa 2004-02-26 21:03:36 Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous Message Greg Stark 2004-02-26 20:38:47 Re: ORDER BY different locales

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Costa 2004-02-26 21:03:36 Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-02-26 20:28:44 Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexey Borzov 2004-02-26 20:48:56 Re: Upgraded Site..any news ?
Previous Message David Costa 2004-02-26 20:31:17 Upgraded Site..any news ?