Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tollef Fog Heen <tollef(dot)fog(dot)heen(at)collabora(dot)co(dot)uk>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Subject: Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq
Date: 2010-02-12 10:15:32
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Peter Geoghegan
<peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> keepalive doesn't work,
>> then it would have to wait for a long time until it detects
>> the outage.
> I'm not really sure what you mean. In this scenario, would it take as
> long as it would have taken had keepalives not been used?

Please see the following threads.


Fujii Masao
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2010-02-12 10:23:59
Subject: Re: Streaming Replication docs
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2010-02-12 10:15:31
Subject: Re: Streaming Replication docs

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group