Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Open Sourcing pgManage

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Open Sourcing pgManage
Date: 2003-11-04 19:52:11
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers

  If that is the case that is fine. I just wanted to throw it out there 
but doesn't that mean that
psql would be separate as well?


Peter Eisentraut wrote:

>Joshua D. Drake writes:
>>  I thought that we might donate it to the project as a whole. What are
>>people's thoughts on
>I think the decision has been made that no new client applications will be
>included with PostgreSQL.  We will provide a server and let a happy bunch
>of client applications and libraries develop around it.  That has worked
>out pretty well lately, I think.

Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-222-2783 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com -
Editor-N-Chief - PostgreSQl.Org - 

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Rod TaylorDate: 2003-11-04 19:53:10
Subject: Re: Open Sourcing pgManage
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2003-11-04 19:44:02
Subject: Re: Open Sourcing pgManage

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group