Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Profiling

From: "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Profiling
Date: 2002-12-17 14:29:42
Message-ID: 3DFF822E.3862.23CE04@localhost (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
On 17 Dec 2002 at 8:20, Cory 'G' Watson wrote:
> By my math, I'll need to vacuum once every hour or so.  Cron, here I 
> come.
> vacuumdb --table cached_metrics loggerithim

Yeah, yeah.. I wrote that..and use CVS as usual. No release as yet..

> I assume I do not need a --analyze, since that table has no indexes.  
> Should I vacuum the entire DB?

You need analyse to keep vacuum non-locking I assume. And there is no need to 
vacuum entire DB.



paycheck:	The weekly $5.27 that remains after deductions for federal	
withholding, state withholding, city withholding, FICA,	medical/dental, long-
term disability, unemployment insurance,	Christmas Club, and payroll savings 
plan contributions.

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-12-17 14:49:16
Subject: Re: Profiling
Previous:From: Cory 'G' WatsonDate: 2002-12-17 14:20:21
Subject: Re: Profiling

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group