From: | Joe Conway <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org |
Cc: | thomas(at)pgsql(dot)com, PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Second call for platform testing |
Date: | 2001-11-29 20:07:28 |
Message-ID: | 3C069580.8010704@home.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>>Are you still looking for HPUX 11.0+ ? I can arrange for access to one
>>if we still need it (gcc though, I don't have access to HP's compiler).
>>
>
> Yes, that would be great. 10.20 is pretty old afaik...
>
> - Thomas
>
>
I ran into a problem on HPUX 11 right off with:
===============================
configure --enable-debug
.
.
.
checking for struct sockaddr_un... yes
checking for int timezone... yes
checking types of arguments for accept()... configure: error: could not
determine argument types
===============================
I won't pretend to be very knowledgable about HPUX or configure, but it
looks like the following in configure is where it dies:
===============================
else
for ac_cv_func_accept_arg1 in 'int' 'unsigned int'; do
for ac_cv_func_accept_arg2 in 'struct sockaddr *' 'const struct
sockaddr *' 'void *'; do
for ac_cv_func_accept_arg3 in 'int' 'size_t' 'socklen_t'
'unsigned int' 'void'; do
cat > conftest.$ac_ext <<EOF
=======================================
and here's what the HPUX man page says:
=======================================
accept(2)
NAME
accept - accept a connection on a socket
SYNOPSIS
#include <sys/socket.h>
AF_CCITT only
#include <x25/x25addrstr.h>
int accept(int s, void *addr, int *addrlen);
_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED only (UNIX 98)
int accept(int s, struct sockaddr *addr, socklen_t *addrlen);
=======================================
so it looks like configure expects the third argument to be (int), when
on HPUX 11 the third argument is (int *).
Any ideas what I'm doing wrong?
-- Joe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brian McCane | 2001-11-29 20:13:13 | Re: Vacuum |
Previous Message | Cyril VELTER | 2001-11-29 19:51:32 | Re: Second call for platform testing |