Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: Fixes to index pages

From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Fixes to index pages
Date: 2001-02-22 02:46:18
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > > > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >
> > I don't think it's a good idea to fill bit 13 by force.
> > There's only 1 bit unused. IMHO there must be a discussion
> > about how to use the bit.
> I am not doing anything to 7.1, just 7.2.  My patch is just an attempt
> to make the source accurate. 

Hmm I've already been confused by your attempt.
For example, oops where's the discussion about changing
index tuple length limit ? etc ...
And I understand now that the original question was thrown
to Tom. I'll leave the choise to Tom.

Hiroshi Inoue

In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-02-22 03:22:42
Subject: Re: Re: Fixes to index pages
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-02-22 02:21:17
Subject: Re: Re: Fixes to index pages

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group