Re: Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsql-novice

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsql-novice
Date: 2000-11-28 08:06:49
Message-ID: 3A236799.D79B57D2@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-novice

> (the second one fails). Now that I look, this breakage was introduced in
> March when "we" expunged operators allowed as identifiers (Tom Lane and
> I have blood on our hands on this one ;) See gram.y around line 5409.
> Suggestions?

Any problems with allowing OVERLAPS and BETWEEN as function names? bison
seems happy with no shift/reduce conflicts...

- Thomas

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message john huttley 2000-11-28 08:09:38 Re: Full text Indexing -out of contrib and into main..
Previous Message john huttley 2000-11-28 07:53:42 Re: Full text Indexing -out of contrib and into main..

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-11-28 14:49:37 Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsql-novice
Previous Message Rynell Wesson 2000-11-28 00:26:15 Re: Can not find -lpq