Re: LIKE is still short some MULTIBYTE code

From: Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: LIKE is still short some MULTIBYTE code
Date: 2000-09-15 20:26:38
Message-ID: 39C285FE.46CA773F@selectacast.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hasn't the [HACKERS] / [GENERAL] crossover thing been resolved yet? I'm
not subscribed to hackers.

Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I finished revising the LIKE operators back into an index-optimizable
> form. But I notice there is some non-multibyte-aware code that needs
> to be fixed, specifically the pattern analysis routines in
> src/backend/utils/adt/selfuncs.c:
> like_fixed_prefix
> regex_fixed_prefix
> like_selectivity
> regex_selectivity_sub
> regex_selectivity
> I don't have time to work on this now, but perhaps someone else would
> like to fix these...
>
> regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 2000-09-15 21:08:15 Cannot compile
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-09-15 20:06:47 LIKE is still short some MULTIBYTE code