Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: UFS 2: soft updates vs. gjournal (AKA: Choosing a filesystem 2.)

From: Axel Rau <Axel(dot)Rau(at)chaos1(dot)de>
To: Laszlo Nagy <gandalf(at)shopzeus(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: UFS 2: soft updates vs. gjournal (AKA: Choosing a filesystem 2.)
Date: 2008-09-24 15:05:34
Message-ID: 3936C50C-0D27-4D22-9782-9EA2BCC0385D@Chaos1.DE (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
Am 24.09.2008 um 12:18 schrieb Laszlo Nagy:

> Should I use gjournal on FreeBSD 7? Or just soft updates?
I'm using gjournal for 5 weeks now on my production server.
There are 4 journaled filesystems on a raid controller with
BBU. pg uses 23GB out of 1.6TB. I can't see any performance impact or  
other issue.
Recovery from an unclean shutdown took less than a minute as compared  
to half an hour with ufs2/softupdates/fsck.
However I'm still unsure if I should enable async mounts of rhe fs  
with tablespaces/WAL.
Anybody giving me advice?

--- ar3

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Richard BroersmaDate: 2008-09-24 19:22:49
Subject: Re: query planner and scanning methods
Previous:From: Steve ClarkDate: 2008-09-24 11:11:57
Subject: Re: Intel's X25-M SSD

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group