INET operators and NOT

From: Tomas Cerha <t(dot)cerha(at)sh(dot)cvut(dot)cz>
To: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: INET operators and NOT
Date: 1999-12-28 20:14:46
Message-ID: 38691A36.F3346F95@sh.cvut.cz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Your name : Tomas Cerha
Your email address : t(dot)cerha(at)sh(dot)cvut(dot)cz
----------------------------------------------------------------------
System Configuration
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Architecture (example: Intel Pentium) : Intel Pentium MMX
Operating System (example: Linux 2.0.26 ELF) : Linux 2.2.5-15 ELF
PostgreSQL version (example: PostgreSQL-6.5.3): PostgreSQL-6.5.3
Compiler used (example: gcc 2.8.0) : installed from RPMs
installed packages:
postgresql-6.5.3-1.i386.rpm
postgresql-perl-6.5.3-1.i386.rpm
postgresql-server-6.5.3-1.i386.rpm
postgresql-tcl-6.5.3-1.i386.rpm
postgresql-test-6.5.3-1.rpm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've already posted this bug, but nobody replied yet ... I was not
subscribed, but now I am. If it is not significant, I'm sorry to
overload this
mailing list... Now to the problem:

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please enter a FULL description of your problem:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Aplying the NOT operator with << INET operator results always in false.
See the example below:

This is the contents of table a:

accounting=> SELECT * FROM a;
ip
--------
10.1.1.1
10.1.1.2
10.2.1.2
10.2.1.1
(4 rows)

Now, let's select only those hosts from subnet '10.1/16': (works fine)

accounting=> SELECT * FROM a WHERE ip<<'10.1/16';
ip
--------
10.1.1.1
10.1.1.2
(2 rows)

And now, I only apply NOT to prewious statement ....

accounting=> SELECT * FROM a WHERE NOT ip<<'10.1/16';
ip
--
(0 rows)

But that is not true! I tryed this also with other versions of postgress
on other machines and the result was always the same. But this makes all
about INET operators quite unusable, when I am not able to exclude some
address space (I can only include them). Or is there another way to do
It?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please describe a way to repeat the problem. Please try to provide a
concise reproducible example, if at all possible:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

CREATE TABLE a (ip inet);

INSERT INTO a VALUES ('10.1.1.1');
INSERT INTO a VALUES ('10.1.1.2');
INSERT INTO a VALUES ('10.2.1.2');
INSERT INTO a VALUES ('10.2.1.1');

SELECT * FROM a;
SELECT * FROM a WHERE ip<<'10.1/16';
SELECT * FROM a WHERE NOT ip<<'10.1/16';

DROP TABLE a;

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you for any idea which could help to solve this problem ...

Tom Cerha, student, FEE CTU Prague Czech Republic

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Samuel A Horwitz 1999-12-28 20:19:51 rs6000-aix4.2.1.0 - build failure[B
Previous Message Tomas Cerha 1999-12-28 20:09:15 INET operators and NOT

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 1999-12-28 22:14:17 Re: [HACKERS] dubious improvement in new psql
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-12-28 15:19:18 Re: [HACKERS] can't link libpq.so(inet_aton() not found)