Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL

From: Adriaan Joubert <a(dot)joubert(at)albourne(dot)com>
To: john huttley <john(at)mwk(dot)co(dot)nz>
Cc: PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL
Date: 1999-12-27 12:12:22
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-general
john huttley wrote:

> > I believe we are adding Oracle compatibility as possible.  We are
> > working on write-ahead log, long tuples, foreign keys, and outer joins.
> > Anything else?
> Yes, earlier in the year I was trying to migrate from Pervasive SQL to
> posgtres and
> came to a screaming halt when it wouldn't do a large view. Exceeded some
> sort of internal buffer
> or rule area. I dont recall the details, although the mail archive will have
> it.

This will be fixed by Jan's new compressed type and the long fields in a second
table.  So in about 6 months time.

The one we still need is views on UNION's...


In response to

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Adam SzeligaDate: 1999-12-27 12:59:33
Subject: The process ID of the backend ?
Previous:From: Karel Zak - ZakkrDate: 1999-12-27 11:46:17
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group