Tom Lane wrote:
> Jernej Zajc <jernej(at)4u(dot)net> writes:
> > is there any rough estimate of when Postgres ANSI SQL compliance
> > is planned to be implemented? Will it be in 6.6, 6.7, or later?
> What do you define as "ANSI compliance"?
Maybe he means stripping of all extensions to ANSI :)
> There isn't any master plan that says "we will have every single
> SQL92 feature implemented by release N". (In fact, as far as I
> can tell there's no master plan at all ;-).)
AFAIK there is no single dtatbase, commercial or free, that has
every single feature of SQL92 implemented.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Vadim Mikheev||Date: 1999-08-30 01:39:50|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Why not sub-selects in targetlists?|
|Previous:||From: Hub.Org News Admin||Date: 1999-08-29 20:09:25|