Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] ANSI SQL compliance

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)trust(dot)ee>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jernej Zajc <jernej(at)4u(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ANSI SQL compliance
Date: 1999-08-29 20:23:54
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jernej Zajc <jernej(at)4u(dot)net> writes:
> > is there any rough estimate of when Postgres ANSI SQL compliance
> > is planned to be implemented? Will it be in 6.6, 6.7, or later?
> What do you define as "ANSI compliance"?

Maybe he means stripping of all extensions to ANSI :)

> There isn't any master plan that says "we will have every single
> SQL92 feature implemented by release N".  (In fact, as far as I
> can tell there's no master plan at all ;-).)

AFAIK there is no single dtatbase, commercial or free, that has 
every single feature of SQL92 implemented.


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Vadim MikheevDate: 1999-08-30 01:39:50
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Why not sub-selects in targetlists?
Previous:From: Hub.Org News AdminDate: 1999-08-29 20:09:25

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group