From: | Constantin Teodorescu <teo(at)flex(dot)ro> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | rdboer(at)hrs-rotterdam(dot)nl, spider(at)chatswood(dot)alphanet(dot)net(dot)au, Bugs for PostgreSQL <bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [QUESTIONS] Char types with ODBC and Access 97 |
Date: | 1998-03-25 10:12:38 |
Message-ID: | 3518D896.8AB3AA4@flex.ro |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > I find it also very strange that pgaccess 0.84 is reporting a field size of
> > -5 for varchar type, and psql reports the correct size.
>
> Yes, this looks like a bug in pgaccess when I ask for Object/Information
> on a table that contains a char(). Perhaps the author could look at
> psql.c to see how we handle these special cases in the \d command. [I
> am CC'ing the pgaccess author on this.]
Yes. It's a bug.
I'm trying to find some time to fix it.
--
Constantin Teodorescu
FLEX Consulting Braila, ROMANIA
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Constantin Teodorescu | 1998-03-25 10:55:02 | Re: [INTERFACES] Re: pgaccess "exec" queries |
Previous Message | Sergey S. Kosyakov | 1998-03-25 09:04:45 | Re: [QUESTIONS] update NOT NULL via LIBPQ |