Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I find it also very strange that pgaccess 0.84 is reporting a field size of
> > -5 for varchar type, and psql reports the correct size.
> Yes, this looks like a bug in pgaccess when I ask for Object/Information
> on a table that contains a char(). Perhaps the author could look at
> psql.c to see how we handle these special cases in the \d command. [I
> am CC'ing the pgaccess author on this.]
Yes. It's a bug.
I'm trying to find some time to fix it.
FLEX Consulting Braila, ROMANIA
pgsql-interfaces by date
|Next:||From: Constantin Teodorescu||Date: 1998-03-25 10:55:02|
|Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: pgaccess "exec" queries|
|Previous:||From: Sergey S. Kosyakov||Date: 1998-03-25 09:04:45|
|Subject: Re: [QUESTIONS] update NOT NULL via LIBPQ|