Re: VoIP recommendations

From: "Tony Godshall" <togo(at)of(dot)net>
To: "Reece Hart" <reece(at)harts(dot)net>
Cc: "SF PostgreSQL" <sfpug(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: VoIP recommendations
Date: 2007-01-18 18:13:28
Message-ID: 3424dc900701181013vdc0355flaadcdfabca74c304@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: sfpug

I evaluated standards-based sipphone.com last year.

It seemed to work quite well.

But we never used it all that much.

Way cheaper than $20/month too.

On 1/18/07, Reece Hart <reece(at)harts(dot)net> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 20:40 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> For my part, I looked at the VOIP options a year ago and decided to keep shelling out to AT&T.
>
>
> Thanks everyone for the advice.
>
> I'm looking for reliable home-based VoIP, if it exists. As I intimated in
> the OP, the bar is pretty low with Vonage. (For example, rebooting the
> vonage router every other day would be an improvement.) I decided to take
> Quinn's advice and signed up for Broadvoice. After all, he does this sort of
> thing for a living. Send me email in a few months if you're curious about
> the quality, ease-of-use, etc.
>
> AT&T is our safety net. I almost signed up there last night, but was
> defeated by their user-hostile web interface and the 10 minute wait time to
> start new service. Oh, for the days when customer service actually meant it.
>
> Cheers,
> Reece
>
> --
> Reece Hart, http://harts.net/reece/, GPG:0x25EC91A0
> ./universe -G 6.672e-11 -e 1.602e-19 -protonmass 1.673e-27 -uspres bush
> kernel warning: universe consuming too many resources. Killing.
> universe killed due to catastrophic leadership. Try -uspres carter.
>
>

--
--
Tony Godshall (g)

In response to

Responses

Browse sfpug by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message George Pavlov 2007-01-18 20:23:45 Re: VoIP recommendations
Previous Message Reece Hart 2007-01-18 18:09:47 Re: VoIP recommendations