Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Low Budget Performance, Part 2

From: eric soroos <eric-psql(at)soroos(dot)net>
To: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Low Budget Performance, Part 2
Date: 2002-11-28 18:39:13
Message-ID: 31018458.1173642543@[] (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
> > Going back to the OP, you think the CPU load is so high when using SCSI
> > because of underperforming APPLE drivers?
> Hmmm..... Eric, have you tuned PostgreSQL's memory buffers at all?

Shared memory, buffers, and sort memory have been boosted as well as the number of clients. 

The tuning that I've done is for my app, not for pgbench.  


In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: David JerichoDate: 2002-11-29 02:58:31
Subject: Re: H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on faster HDDs
Previous:From: eric soroosDate: 2002-11-28 18:32:46
Subject: Re: Low Budget Performance, Part 2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group