Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Contributor List policy

From: Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, bruce(at)momjian(dot)us, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Subject: Re: Contributor List policy
Date: 2008-03-11 01:59:49
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Mar 10, 2008, at 9:55 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
>> ... there should be two lists, of which you
>> would definitely be label'd a 'Major Contributor' ...
> I've been thinking that for awhile.  Core is in a good position to see
> who are major or minor code contributors, but we are not so well  
> placed
> to see who's contributing in a non-code fashion.  If there's going to
> be recognition for non-code contributions I'd be happy to see that  
> be a
> separate list managed by someone else.  How this all gets presented on
> the website (one page or several?) is not clear.

I always like to look at how others have done this before. 

Dan Langille --

In response to


pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2008-03-11 02:04:59
Subject: Re: Contributor List policy
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-03-11 01:55:08
Subject: Re: Contributor List policy

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group