Re: [HACKERS] listening addresses

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] listening addresses
Date: 2004-03-21 17:23:39
Message-ID: 26243.1079889819@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> This patch attempts to implement the idea, with safety in case the
> packet is not immediately available.

Seems like you ought to be testing for failure returns from send() and
recv(). Also, what of EINTR from select()?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sailesh Krishnamurthy 2004-03-21 17:35:37 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Sync vs. fsync during
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-03-21 16:46:16 Re: [HACKERS] listening addresses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-03-21 18:11:49 Re: Syntax error reporting (was Re: [PATCHES] syntax error position "CREATE FUNCTION" bug fix)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-03-21 17:19:33 Re: listening addresses