Re: [GENERAL] Number format problem

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Number format problem
Date: 2006-02-12 23:24:52
Message-ID: 25558.1139786692@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I have applied the following patch for 8.2. I have not applied to 8.1.X
> because it is a behavior change.

This patch broke the regression tests. It seems to change the C-locale
behavior on many platforms.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ken Winter 2006-02-12 23:35:13 Why does an ON SELECT rule have to be named "_RETURN"?
Previous Message Johan Vromans 2006-02-12 22:36:51 Re: Last modification time

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-02-12 23:45:12 Re: [GENERAL] Number format problem
Previous Message Chris Campbell 2006-02-12 21:33:27 Re: OS X shared memory documentation