Re: EXECUTE status (was Re: [ODBC] About server side prepare)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: EXECUTE status (was Re: [ODBC] About server side prepare)
Date: 2002-12-20 18:02:58
Message-ID: 23730.1040407378@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-odbc

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> It is easy to determine what tag to return? Remember the discussion on
> rules and that only the original tag should be returned. Is there
> always one obvious tag to an execute?

I would think we'd do it via the rule that we return the same thing
you'd get if you directly issued the query that appears as the body
of the PREPARE command. All the special cases for rules and so on
seem to apply the same way if you do that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-12-20 18:05:39 Re: EXECUTE status (was Re: [ODBC] About server side prepare)
Previous Message Jeroen T. Vermeulen 2002-12-20 18:02:39 Re: EXECUTE status (was Re: [ODBC] About server side prepare)

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-12-20 18:05:39 Re: EXECUTE status (was Re: [ODBC] About server side prepare)
Previous Message Jeroen T. Vermeulen 2002-12-20 18:02:39 Re: EXECUTE status (was Re: [ODBC] About server side prepare)