Re: Assertion failure with small block sizes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Assertion failure with small block sizes
Date: 2007-10-14 14:55:54
Message-ID: 23179.1192373754@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Testing Postgres with a small block size runs into an assertion failure when
> it tries to toast a pg_proc tuple during initdb. I think the assertion is just
> wrong and RELKIND_UNCATALOGUED is valid here.

Uh, what makes you think the assertion is the only problem? The toast
table won't exist yet.

How small is "small" anyway?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2007-10-14 15:46:01 Re: Assertion failure with small block sizes
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2007-10-14 14:48:36 Assertion failure with small block sizes