> > > If not, I'd vote for pulling it out. That's a heck of a
> poor word to
> > > reserve.
> > I am afraid of lots of user complaints, even if we had not
> already used
> > TEMP.
> OK, but we've already got "user complaints" about TEMP being a
> reserved word, so that part seems to balance out. There is apparently
> no basis in published standards for TEMP being a reserved word. And
> btw it is not currently documented as a reserved word in
TEMP is not a reserved word in informix, so there seems to be the
possibility to do a
The portability syntax that would be needed is only:
select * from table where ..... INTO TEMP _mytemp;
Your example had the into temp after the select list, which does
not work in informix.
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Thomas Lockhart||Date: 2000-02-29 14:19:47|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE|
|Previous:||From: The Hermit Hacker||Date: 2000-02-29 13:17:08|
|Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN|