Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning
Date: 2008-01-12 20:42:27
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 11:57 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It would be far *more* useful if it didn't have to be superuser-only.
>> And since the actual details of the snapshot content are really of
>> zero interest to the user, I think making it pass through his hands
>> is simply misdesign.

> No, its deliberate, because I want this to work on prior releases. I
> didn't clearly explain that, sorry.

Why are you trying to get the community to do design for things that
are certainly not going to appear in any community release?

In any case, even if you were trying to back-port this to prior
releases, I don't see how exposing the innards to clients will make
it any easier.  All the hard parts will be the same.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2008-01-12 21:08:32
Subject: Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-01-12 20:39:29
Subject: Re: getting out boolean value from PQgetValue function

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group