Re: [HACKERS] 8.3beta1 testing on Solaris

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Jignesh K(dot) Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)sun(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 8.3beta1 testing on Solaris
Date: 2007-10-26 03:26:08
Message-ID: 2139.1193369168@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Actually, 32 made a significant difference as I recall ... do you still have
> the figures for that, Jignesh?

I'd want to see a new set of test runs backing up any call for a change
in NUM_CLOG_BUFFERS --- we've changed enough stuff around this area that
benchmarks using code from a few months back shouldn't carry a lot of
weight.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2007-10-26 04:21:56 PANIC caused by open_sync on Linux
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2007-10-26 02:56:56 Re: [HACKERS] 8.3beta1 testing on Solaris

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2007-10-26 08:07:23 Re: [HACKERS] 8.3beta1 testing on Solaris
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2007-10-26 02:56:56 Re: [HACKERS] 8.3beta1 testing on Solaris