Re: [HACKERS] initdb

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] initdb
Date: 2003-10-04 19:58:35
Message-ID: 21306.1065297515@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I now have a C implementation of initdb, ...
> There's a little work still to go (see below), but I'd appreciate some
> eyeballs on it to see if I have made any major booboos, or could have
> done things better. What's the best way to proceed?

Put it on a web page and post the link, or if you don't have a website,
send it to pgsql-patches (clearly marked as "not ready to apply").

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • initdb at 2003-10-03 18:32:56 from Andrew Dunstan

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2003-10-04 20:59:00 Re: COUNT(*) again (was Re: [HACKERS] Index/Function
Previous Message James Rogers 2003-10-04 19:19:46 Re: Index/Function organized table layout

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-10-04 23:15:15 Re: [HACKERS] initdb
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-10-03 18:57:42 Re: initdb

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-10-04 22:51:08 Re: more spanish updates
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-10-04 19:43:34 Re: fix log_min_duration_statement logic error