Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>, Steve Singer <ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies
Date: 2011-02-24 00:39:23
Message-ID: 20432.1298507963@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mi feb 23 19:39:23 -0300 2011:
>> My recollection is that this was pretty tightly coupled to the wCTE
>> patch. I had been intending to review them together, and have just
>> now come up for air enough to start doing that. Do you really want
>> to review this one separately?

> Dunno. If you're gonna pick it up I guess my time is best spent
> elsewhere. There was some restructuring in code in postgres.c to be
> done near this patch, which wasn't attacked at all by Marko AFAICS.
> Maybe I should be looking at that instead.

Well, Marko claims they're independent, so if you feel it fits into
what you're doing you're welcome to it. But I was planning to deal
with Marko's two patches as soon as the FDW dust settled, and it
seems to be settled.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Tiikkaja 2011-02-24 00:52:42 Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies
Previous Message Marko Tiikkaja 2011-02-24 00:38:05 Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies