| From: | Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Extend ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES for large objects |
| Date: | 2025-06-11 05:03:01 |
| Message-ID: | 20250611140301.56e27e4a9f7406cc7b182437@sraoss.co.jp |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 13:33:07 +0900
Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> On 2025/06/11 11:49, Yugo Nagata wrote:
> > While looking at the thread [1], I've remembered this thread.
> > The patches in this thread are partially v18-related, but include
> > enhancement or fixes for existing feature, so should they be postponed
> > to v19, or should be separated properly to v18 part and other?
> >
> > [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/70372bdd-4399-4d5b-ab4f-6d4487a4911a%40oss.nttdata.com
>
> I see these patches more as enhancements to psql tab-completion,
> rather than fixes for clear oversights in the original commit.
>
> For example, if tab-completion for ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES had
> completely missed LARGE OBJECTS, that would be an obvious oversight.
> But these patches go beyond that kind of issue.
Thank you for your clarification. I agreed.
Best regards,
Yugo Nagata
--
Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2025-06-11 05:35:30 | Re: Question on error code selection in conflict detection |
| Previous Message | Yugo Nagata | 2025-06-11 04:57:37 | Re: Extend ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES for large objects |