Re: [PATCH] kNN for btree

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kNN for btree
Date: 2019-02-04 05:35:29
Message-ID: 20190204053529.GQ29064@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 04:01:51PM +0300, Nikita Glukhov wrote:
> All new distance functions except oiddist() are not leakproof,
> so I had to relax condition in opr_sanity.sql test:

This patch set needs a rebase because of conflicts caused by the
recent patches for pluggable storage.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mohammad Sherafat 2019-02-04 05:36:39 What happens if checkpoint haven't completed until the next checkpoint interval or max_wal_size?
Previous Message amul sul 2019-02-04 05:35:06 Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join