Re: Adding a TAP test checking data consistency on standby with minRecoveryPoint

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Adding a TAP test checking data consistency on standby with minRecoveryPoint
Date: 2019-01-31 06:49:24
Message-ID: 20190131064924.GB13429@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 01:08:38PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Thanks! I am stealing that stuff, and I have added an offline check by
> comparing the value of minRecoveryPoint in pg_controldata. Again, if
> you revert c186ba13 and run the tests, both online and offline failures
> are showing up.
>
> What do you think?

I think that this test has some value, and it did not get any reviews,
so I am moving it to the next CF.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-01-31 06:59:11 Re: Add pg_partition_root to get top-most parent of a partition tree
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-01-31 06:47:59 Re: Unused parameters & co in code