Re: Sample values for pg_stat_statements

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sample values for pg_stat_statements
Date: 2018-06-22 00:38:19
Message-ID: 20180622003819.GB3522@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:28:01PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> I happened to notice that this patch was moved from Returned with Feedback to
> Needs Review after the CF closed, which means it’s now sitting open in a closed
> CF. The intended flow after RWF is that the patch is resubmitted, rather than
> status changed, but since it’s there now I guess we might as well move it to
> the current CF to make sure it’s not overlooked (which it will be in the
> current state)?

Indeed, done.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-06-22 00:48:15 Re: PATCH: backtraces for error messages
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2018-06-22 00:24:45 Re: PATCH: backtraces for error messages