Re: logical changeset generation v4

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: logical changeset generation v4
Date: 2013-01-15 10:59:41
Message-ID: 20130115105940.GB5115@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2013-01-15 01:00:00 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andres Freund wrote:
>
> I've been giving a couple of these parts a look. In particular
>
> > [03] Split out xlog reading into its own module called xlogreader
>
> Cleaned this one up a bit last week. I will polish it some more,
> publish for some final comments, and commit.

I have some smaller bugfixes in my current version that you probably
don't have yet (on grounds of being fixed this weekend)... So we need to
be a bit careful not too loose those.
> > Second, I don't think the test_logical_replication functions should live
> > in core as they shouldn't be used for a production replication scenario
> > (causes longrunning transactions, requires polling) , but I have failed
> > to find a neat way to include a contrib extension in the plain
> > regression tests.
>
> I think this would work if you make a "stamp" file in the contrib
> module, similar to how doc/src/sgml uses those.

I tried that, the problem is not the building itself but getting it
installed into the temporary installation...
But anyway, testing decoding requires a different wal_level so I was
hesitant to continue on grounds of that alone.
Should we just up that? Its probably problematic for tests arround some
WAL optimizations an such?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-01-15 11:36:25 Re: [PATCH] Compile without warning with gcc's -Wtype-limits, -Wempty-body
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-01-15 10:55:41 Re: logical changeset generation v4