> Those are the basic requirements that I am trying to address. There
> are a great many important details, but the core of this is probably
> what I would call "logical replication", that is shipping changes to
> other nodes in a way that does not tie us to the same physical
> representation that recovery/streaming replication does now. Of
> course, non-physical replication can take many forms.
Guessing from "shipping changes to other nodes", you seem to
implicitly aim at asynchronous replication? If so, I am afraid it will
force users to pay some cost to migrate from existig applications.
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2012-05-01 00:20:04|
|Subject: Call for Lightning Talks for pgCon|
|Previous:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2012-04-30 23:34:12|
|Subject: Re: Future In-Core Replication|