Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ECPG FETCH readahead

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>,Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>,Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>,PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>,Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: ECPG FETCH readahead
Date: 2012-03-29 18:34:48
Message-ID: 20120329183448.GA14785@feivel.credativ.lan (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 01:03:41PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> Still, we're looking at dedicated ECPG syntax, quite visible even to folks
> with no interest in Informix.  We have eschewed littering our syntax with
> compatibility aids, and I like it that way.  IMO, an option to the "ecpg"
> preprocessor is an acceptable level of muddle to provide this aid.  A DECLARE
> CURSOR syntax extension goes too far.

+1 from me.

Let's not add special ecpg sql syntax if we don't absolutely have to.

Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael.meskes at googlemail dot com
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-03-29 18:39:04
Subject: Re: Finer Extension dependencies
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2012-03-29 18:28:39
Subject: Re: Finer Extension dependencies

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group