On Monday, December 12, 2011 07:48:01 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > On Monday, December 12, 2011 09:29:23 AM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >> Revert the behavior of inet/cidr functions to not unpack the arguments.
> > Whats the plan to handle this wrt a stable release?
> I was wondering whether we shouldn't revert the original patch
> altogether in the back branches. As far as I'd heard, there were
> no reports of the previous coding causing real trouble, and this
> episode demonstrates that there is a possibility to make things
> worse rather than better. I think maybe we'd better treat this
> change as something to make in HEAD only.
In response to
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: Rafael Martinez||Date: 2011-12-12 19:53:09|
|Subject: Re: pgsql: Revert the behavior of inet/cidr functions
to not unpack the arg|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2011-12-12 18:48:01|
|Subject: Re: pgsql: Revert the behavior of inet/cidr functions to not unpack the arg |