Re: FATAL: lock AccessShareLock on object 0/1260/0 is already held

From: daveg <daveg(at)sonic(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FATAL: lock AccessShareLock on object 0/1260/0 is already held
Date: 2011-09-08 06:35:29
Message-ID: 20110908063529.GR24583@sonic.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 09:02:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> daveg <daveg(at)sonic(dot)net> writes:
> > On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 07:39:15PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> BTW ... what were the last versions you were running on which you had
> >> *not* seen the problem? (Just wondering about the possibility that we
> >> back-patched some "fix" that broke things. It would be good to have
> >> a version range before trawling the commit logs.)
>
> > The first version we saw it on was 8.4.7.
>
> Yeah, you said that. I was wondering what you'd last run before 8.4.7.

Sorry, misunderstood. We were previously running 8.4.4, but have been on 8.4.7
since shortly after it was released. Prior to that we have had all the major
and most of the minor releases since 7.1.

-dg

--
David Gould daveg(at)sonic(dot)net 510 536 1443 510 282 0869
If simplicity worked, the world would be overrun with insects.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2011-09-08 07:08:08 Re: postgresql.conf archive_command example
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2011-09-08 06:26:10 Re: postgresql.conf archive_command example