Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [SPAM]Mammoth in Core?

From: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [SPAM]Mammoth in Core?
Date: 2010-01-18 09:13:11
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:

> My question is, do we have any interest in working on getting this into
> core?

We had a discussion how replication projects work together with the core
in the developer meeting on PGCon 2009 Japan.

The conclusion is splitting existing projects into some 'modules',
and getting the modules one by one into core. Voted features are here:

Mammoth Replicator seems to modify the core heavily, no?  I hope you
would split the mammoth patch into several independent features,
and submit them separately. It is much better if some of them can
be shared by other replication projects.

Takahiro Itagaki
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Leonardo FDate: 2010-01-18 09:13:14
Subject: Re: Review: Patch: Allow substring/replace() to get/set bit values
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2010-01-18 08:56:56
Subject: Re: New XLOG record indicating WAL-skipping

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group