Re: damage control mode

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: damage control mode
Date: 2010-01-08 17:14:53
Message-ID: 20100108171453.GU17756@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Kevin Grittner (Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov) wrote:
> It also seems to call into question the wisdom of annual releases.
> If we had a two-year cycle which had three times as much in it,
> would that be an improvement, or not?

At the moment, my vote would be "how 'bout we discuss this post-8.5?".
Maybe if we postpone the discussion till then, we'll actually be able to
chew through everything and release close to on-time, otherwise I wonder
if a thread like this won't end up sucking up too much in terms of our
resources right at crunch time..

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2010-01-08 17:16:23 Re: damage control mode
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2010-01-08 17:13:54 Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Add-On Network