Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: damage control mode

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>,Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: damage control mode
Date: 2010-01-08 17:14:53
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
* Kevin Grittner (Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov) wrote:
> It also seems to call into question the wisdom of annual releases. 
> If we had a two-year cycle which had three times as much in it,
> would that be an improvement, or not?

At the moment, my vote would be "how 'bout we discuss this post-8.5?".
Maybe if we postpone the discussion till then, we'll actually be able to
chew through everything and release close to on-time, otherwise I wonder
if a thread like this won't end up sucking up too much in terms of our
resources right at crunch time..



In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: David E. WheelerDate: 2010-01-08 17:16:23
Subject: Re: damage control mode
Previous:From: David E. WheelerDate: 2010-01-08 17:13:54
Subject: Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Add-On Network

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group